interpersonal trust scale scoring

New York, NY: Wiley. Would love your thoughts, please comment. This is in line with evidence from Krampen et al. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1, 334343. Dyadic trust proved to be associated with love and with intimacy of self-disclosure, especially for longer married partners. Krosnick, J. Motivated by this need, Beierlein, Kemper, Kovaleva, and Rammstedt (2014a) developed an ultra-shortthree-itemGerman-language measure of interpersonal trust, the Interpersonal Trust Short Scale (German: Kurzskala Interpersonelles Vertrauen; KUSIV3). WebDetermined whether interpersonal trust moderates effects of life stress. Manuscript in preparation. Results show that Ss scoring low in trust had higher stress scores and reported more emotional and physical distress. (1980). Meas Instrum Soc Sci 2, 10 (2020). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. 1 0 obj Understanding Emotional Intelligence - PM Practitioners Social Indicators Research, 137, 641664. Nuisance or remedy? The authors note that trust is an important aspect of interpersonal relationships and that it is crucial to understand how trust operates in specific relationships. PubMedGoogle Scholar. Self Measures for Trust TRUST IN CLOSE Concerning life satisfaction and health, we could replicate the findings of Beierlein, Kemper, et al. Partly in line with previous findings (Beierlein, Kemper, et al., 2014a; Evans & Revelle, 2008; Halamandaris & Power, 1997), we also found a small but substantial positive association of interpersonal trust with Extraversion, but only for the UK. The ITS as a whole or selected items of the ITS have been translated into a number of languages (e.g., a German full version was developed by Amelang, Gold, & Kbel, 1984; single items were translated into Chinese, e.g., Liu, Rau, & Wendler, 2015). Research Article Relationship between Self-Esteem, Handlungstheoretische Persnlichkeitspsychologie: Konzeptuelle und empirische Beitrge zur Konstrukterhellung [Action-theory personality psychology: Conceptual and empirical contributions for the elaboration of the construct] (2nd ed.). Test-retest reliability studies have also found that the scale produces consistent results over time. The aim of the present study was to empirically assess different types of evidence for the validity of the Interpersonal Trust Short Scale, an English-language adaptation of the Kurzskala Interpersonelles Vertrauen (Beierlein, Kemper, et al., 2014a). In addition, higher interpersonal trust is associated with a higher likelihood of accepting work systems in which the supervisor has an influence on the extent of workers remuneration (Kopp & Schuler, 2003). ), Survey measurement and process quality (pp. Integrity refers to the belief that the trusted person is honest and trustworthy. Weinheim: Beltz. To score the scale, each item is assigned a numerical value corresponding to the participants response. Kasperson, Golding, and Tuler (1992) defined trust as a persons expectation that other persons and institutions in a social relationship can be relied upon to act in ways that are competent, predictable, and caring (p. 169). Social Science Research, 42, 347360. WebAbstract. (2014). WebThis finding of multi-dimensionality underscores the incongruence between Rotter's definition and his measure of interpersonal trust. aggression Psychological Reports, 41, 11651166. Table 3 shows the means, standard deviations, skewness, and kurtosis for the three items separately for the English and German samples. Beliefs in justice and faith in people: Just world, religiosity and interpersonal trust. Bowling alone: Americas declining social capital. Additional File 5: Table S1 in the Supplementary Online Material provides the reference ranges in terms of means, standard deviations, skewness, and kurtosis of the KUSIV3 scale scores for the total population, as well as separately for gender and age groups in both states. We will not explicitly differentiate between generalized and limited trust. 15. American Psychologist, 35, 17. Furthermore, the results of measurement invariance testing suggest metric measurement invariance of the scale, thereby implying comparability of correlations based on the latent factors across the UK and Germany. Social trust, interpersonal trust and self-rated health in China: A multi-level study. 0000001011 00000 n Likert https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x, Rotter, J. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). A scale can be regarded as objective when it works (a) independently of the administrator (objectivity of application), (b) independently of the evaluator of the test (objectivity of evaluation), and (c) when unambiguous and user-independent rules are provided (objectivity of interpretation). Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 263276. Psychological Methods, 18, 320334. The subscales are: 1.) Part of Evans, A. M., & Revelle, W. (2008). Internal-external control, interpersonal trust, and the motive to avoid success in college women. Conceptualizing and measuring global interpersonal mistrust-trust. Content of the Interpersonal Relationships Putnam, R. D. (1995). In line with Rotter (1967, 1971), there was a small positive association with socially desirable responding in both samples, but only for the exaggerating positive qualities subscale, which depicts the self-deceptive enhancement component of communion-induced socially desirable responding (Nieen et al., 2019). 4BlV5[9cy%304^-. Item error terms are omitted for clarity. To trust means to expect positive outcomes even in the absence of hard evidence suggesting that positive outcomes will occur. Another example of a generalized expectancy (GE) that has provoked considerable interest and research is the concept of interpersonal trust. Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 106116. Krampen, G., & Hank, P. (2004). Which of the following best describes supervisory ability? Since the 1980s, the prerequisites and consequences of trust have been the subject of mounting interest among researchers in the fields of social psychology, political sciences, sociology, economics, and communication studies. The scale was designed to measure trust in a specific individual, rather than general attitudes towards trust. :xDd3qwdW\juKz*I(Q?dHuK:pM\dj#dLbm8UiC8]f*g]c=V`'u'>,>reO-)-# S6=|p+kwN?0rGPw3e,Ssv=Emz}D`vS*2{Egu/!N+o:x;1k-=2^v HWrd8oA/Q| "CYb#K\tquRB&E>Er5[N!+BUCa?D O#r{q7O:e,J'sMd.OK$r[VD6. Vertrauen [Trust]. An English-language adaptation of the Interpersonal Trust Short Scale (KUSIV3), Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-020-00016-1, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00224-5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1614-4, https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.933697, https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715252, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0139-0, https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2007.106.116, https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155, https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.008, http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&AN=27825358&site=ehost-live, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.04.006, https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-020-00018-z, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00175-4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.061, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01950.x, https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000078, https://doi.org/10.1026//1617-6391.2.4.182, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224814, https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2014.937458, https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1972.31.2.355, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1981.tb00621.x, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0940-7, https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-018-0005-1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y, https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540009600471, http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2008-99120-166&site=ehost-live, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62397-6_12, https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000481, https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216970212006, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9100-z, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x, https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011020471, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01338.x, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9471-4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1978.9921447, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.625, https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200502080-00027, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1976.9921347, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50012-5, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, International Adaptation of Measurement Instruments. 13. Personal Relationships, 18, 668676. IJERPH | Free Full-Text | Internet Gaming Disorder: Evidence for Despite these contrary results concerning political self-placement, the pattern of correlations suggests evidence based on scalecriterion relationships in view of the findings on life satisfaction and health. ESS round 8 source questionnaire. Our intention in choosing relatively liberal cut-off values was to avoid accidentally excluding valid cases and thereby creating a systematic bias in our data. Interpersonal trust and social stress-induced cortisol elevation. Furthermore, trusters are more likely to attend church (Bgue, 2002) and to be members of social and political organizations (Putnam, 2000). WebA 5-item questionnaire designed to measure an individuals general level of trust toward other people. The TS is a self-reporting tool for those with close relationships to measuretheir interpersonal trust. ]H&Kb 3j',O:G~9l O,>rO 0fO{]'6#[zir5cr~+KUYEmWxZyG. (1971). We help others on behalf of you. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Psychological Methods, 17, 354373. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. In order to investigate this type of evidence, we correlated KUSIV3 with the following constructs and criteria: (a) the Big Five dimensions Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Openness assessed with the BFI-2-XS (Rammstedt et al., 2020; Soto & John, 2017); (b) general self-efficacy assessed with GSE-3 (Doll et al., 2020)/ASKU (Beierlein, Kovaleva, et al., 2014); (c) internal and external locus of control assessed with the IE-4 (Kovaleva et al., 2014; Nieen, Groskurth, Rammstedt, et al., 2020b); (d) optimism and pessimism assessed with SOP2 (Kemper, Beierlein, Kovaleva, et al., 2014; Nieen, Groskurth, Kemper, et al., 2020); (e) general life satisfaction assessed with L-1 (Beierlein et al., 2015; Nieen, Groskurth, Rammstedt, et al., 2020a); (f) internal and external political efficacy assessed with PESS (Groskurth et al., 2020)/PEKS (Beierlein, Kemper, et al., 2014b); (g) political preferences assessed with the LeftRight Self-Placement scale (Breyer, 2015); (h) socially desirable responding assessed with the KSE-G (Kemper, Beierlein, Bensch, et al., 2014; Nieen et al., 2019); and (i) self-reported general health measured with the single-item question used in the ESS. 0000008180 00000 n https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv042, Massari, D. J., & Rosenblum, D. C. (1972). To administer the Trust in Close Relationships Scale, individuals are asked to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements related to trust and Nearly six-in-ten (58%) believe it is very important to improve the level of confidence Americans have in each other, while another 35% feel it somewhat important to find ways to restore trust. Therefore, several studies have addressed the development of trust in todays societies over time. Political distrust and social capital in Europe and the USA. Content of the Interpersonal Relationships endobj Which of the following psychotherapeutic techniques is most likely to be used by a client-centered therapist? ), Measure of social psychological attitudes, Vol. Evans, A., & Revelle, W. (2008). Scoring: The high trust choices are 1a, 2a, and 3b. For each one of these give respondent 1 point. Thus, all respondents will have a score ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 signifying a very low level of trust and 3 signifying a very high level of trust. hb```f``R,{@ (A9EO,g#4f(f`hbg`0oCY@\_iF nb^>@ https://doi.org/10.6102/zis185, Kemper, C. J., & Menold, N. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0139-0, Carifio, J., & Perla, R. J. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-020-00018-z, Halamandaris, K. F., & Power, K. G. (1997). GENERAL TRUST SCALE - The Fetzer Institute 65 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<027D22DFCEB52BE71E11B2C724FCF902><858865DC9270224FB14FD3FCE2B203EF>]/Index[55 21]/Info 54 0 R/Length 67/Prev 93328/Root 56 0 R/Size 76/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream %%EOF Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-018-0005-1, Norman, G. (2010). ber einige Erfahrungen mit einer deutschsprachigen Skala zur Erfassung des zwischenmenschlichen Vertrauens (Interpersonal Trust) [Experiences with a German-language scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust]. PubMed WebA new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Conceptual framework for increasing legitimacy Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. For both the UK and Germany, quota samples were drawn that represented the heterogeneity of the adult population with regard to age, gender, and educational attainment. By using this website, you agree to our Men and women's interpersonal trust: An empirical investigation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom). Patient & Physician Trust Measurement Tools The scale is scored on a 5-point gradation from strongly agree to strongly disagree so that strongly disagree and agree responses would mdicate trust on 12 items and strongly disagree and disagree responses would indicate trust on the other 13 items. trust Keep visitingPsychology Roots. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&AN=27825358&site=ehost-live, Fetchenhauer, D., & Dunning, D. (2009). Respondents were financially rewarded for their participation. Gttingen: Hogrefe. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Individuals who reported greater life satisfaction and better general health had a higher propensity for interpersonal trust. Dimensionality of the Rotter Interpersonal Trust Scale As often occurs with (ultra-)short scales, testretest reliability (UK: rtt = .78; DE: rtt = .79) was higher than internal consistency (UK: = .67, = .69; DE: = .73, = .75). Rotter and Mischel: I I The McGraw-Hill, Personality, Sixth Edition Cognitive Social Learning Companies, 2005. Items are answered using a five-point rating scale ranging from do not agree at all (1), over hardly agree (2), somewhat agree (3), and mostly agree (4) to completely agree (5). (2003). ]6xL0v WBuf~F{rimm. 3556). Specifics of interpersonal trust among people with different gender identities. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 10, 9299. %PDF-1.7 Interpersonal To investigate the psychometric properties of the English-language adaptation of KUSIV3, and their comparability with those of the German-language source instrument, we assessed both versions in a web-based survey (using computer-assisted self-administered interviewing [CASI]) conducted in the UK and Germany (DE) by the online access panel provider respondi AG. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis83, Brosseau-Liard, P. E., & Savalei, V. (2014). Boston, MA: Pearson. (2005). 8) Academic Springiness Skala (ARS-30) Journal of Personality, 35, 651665. Trust in Close Relationships Scale - Psychology Roots Table 1 depicts in detail the sample characteristics and their distribution. An English-language adaptation of the InternalExternal Locus of Control Short Scale4 (IE-4). Afterwards, we subsequently conducted multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses (MG-CFA) using a unidimensional measurement model developed for Germany by Beierlein, Kemper, et al. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 375382. 0000023415 00000 n Scales Journal of Personality, 35, 651655. Stadelmann-Steffen, I., & Freitag, M. (2007). WebScoring . Manuscript submitted for publication. Individuals who were high in optimism, life satisfaction, Agreeableness, and Emotional Stability had a tendency to have higher levels of interpersonal trust. Berlin: DIW Berlin. The drugs used to control hallucinations and other psychotic symptoms are called, 9. The models are evaluated on the correlation coefficient between the actual JHM Scale score and the score predicted by the trained model. Thus, studies investigating the functioning of social interactions between single individuals need a valid andespecially in research settings with severe time limitationsefficient measure of interpersonal trust. <>/Metadata 175 0 R/ViewerPreferences 176 0 R>> The authors generated a pool of items related to trust in a specific individual through a process of brainstorming and literature review. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis35, Beierlein, C., Kovaleva, A., Lszl, Z., Kemper, C. J., & Rammstedt, B. Zeitschrift fr Personalpsychologie, 2, 182192. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. The specific measures of interpersonal trust vary across these surveys. Interpersonal Trust Scale. ), Handwrterbuch Pdagogische Psychologie [Pocket dictionary of pedagogic psychology] (3rd ed., pp. 1980; Russell 1982). (2019). Measuring trust: Experiments and surveys in contrast and combination (SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research No. Workplace isolation in pharmaceutical companies: Moderating role of self-efficacy. How is the scale administered and scored?The scale is typically administered as a self-report questionnaire, with participants rating their level of agreement with a series of statements on a 5-point Likert scale. Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust What is the purpose of the Specific Interpersonal Trust Scale?The scale is used to assess trust in a specific individual in a particular relationship or context. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.061, Kasperson, R. E., Golding, D., & Tuler, S. (1992). I feel annoyed that I'm not supposed to do certain things just because I am a man/ a 42 woman). % Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Vertrauen gegenber Vorgesetzten und Akzeptanz von Entgeltsystemen [Trust in supervisors and acceptance of remuneration systems]. In the second-round participants (n = 15) were asked to rate again the importance of the 38 indicators where no consensus had been achieved and the additional 8 indicators identified by experts.In this round, a median rating of 70 (of 100) was required, a somewhat lesser requirement than the first round where the requirement for high Besides content-related evidence, which was provided by Beierlein, Kemper, et al. endstream endobj 56 0 obj <> endobj 57 0 obj <> endobj 58 0 obj <>stream When trust is defined independently of gullibility, as Rotter (1980) contended, then high trust is not only desirable but essential for the survival of civilization. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 625650. Societies can function smoothly only when people have at least a moderate amount of trust in each other. Barefoot, J. C., Maynard, K. E., Beckham, J. C., Brummett, B. H., Hooker, K., & Siegler, I. C. (1998). The first and most longstanding is the Interpersonal Trust Scale (Rotter 1967 ). (2007). Springer, 2016. (1991). The ITS measures an individuals general tendency to trust 207248). 0000005635 00000 n https://doi.org/10.6102/zis184. 0000003575 00000 n <> The General Self-Efficacy Short Scale3 (GSE-3): An English-language adaptation. Assessment, 26, 767782. The surveys comprised the respective language versions of KUSIV3, alongside sociodemographic characteristics and a range of external criteria. From "very disagreement" to "very agreement" scored 1-5 points respectively. Because researchers may be interested in comparing the level of interpersonal trust between different societies, there is a need for a cross-culturally valid measure. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1235-1, Springer Reference Behavioral Science and Psychology, Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences. 0000008158 00000 n Do people trust too much or too little? If there are missing values on one or more items, researchers should use appropriate methods for handling missing data, such as multiple imputation or full information maximum likelihood estimation (see Rose, Wagner, Mayer, & Nagengast, 2019, for an application of maximum likelihood estimation to computing manifest scale scores in a latent variable framework). Manuscript in preparation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.011, Fairbrother, M., & Martin, I. W. (2013). The Specific Interpersonal Trust Scale has been found to have high internal consistency, meaning that the items within each dimension are highly related to each other. B. We assessed international equivalence across the UK and Germany via measurement invariance tests with MG-CFA (Vandenberg & Lance, 2000; Widaman & Reise, 1997). WebInterpersonal trust is defined as the perception you have that other people will not do anything that will harm your interest; the individual is giving the willingness to accept vulnerability or risk based on expectations regarding Seeking construct validity in interpersonal trust research: A proposal on linking theory and survey measures. According to Aaron Beck, negative, __________ underlie depression, 10. Additionally, Stadelmann-Steffen and Freitag (2007) found that interpersonal trust promotes economic development in less developed societies. Klner Zeitschrift fr Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 47, 294320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155, Costa, P. T., McCrae, R., & Dye, D. A. The German-language KUSIV3 was thoroughly validated based on a comprehensive sample representative of the adult population in Germany in terms of age, gender, and educational attainment. In addition, a set of sociodemographic variables (gender, age, highest level of education, income, and employment status) was collected. In his social learning theory of personality, Julian B. Rotter (1971) proposed one of the first and most systematic theoretical descriptions of interpersonal trust, which he defined as an expectation held by an individual or a group that the word, promise, verbal, or written statement of another individual or group can be relied on (p. 444). In our case, the underlying construct can be seen as continuous (the frequency distribution of the KUSIV3 items and scale score is displayed in Figure S1S2 in Additional File 3 in the Supplementary Online Material indicating an approximately normally distributed answering distribution) and the distance between the single answering categories as approximately equidistant. B. DOI: 10.15703/KJC.14.4.201308.2375 Corpus ID: 147171817; The Development of the Interpersonal Harmony Scale for Private Class in Korean Military @article{2013TheDO, title={The Development of the Interpersonal Harmony Scale for Private Class in Korean Military}, author={ and Seong-Hoi Kim}, journal={Korea Here in this post, we are sharing theSpecific Interpersonal Trust Scale. "a'FRre!oc*K':Ix%;=i,0 t Trust, as measured by the RITS, is affected by order (timing) of RITS administration. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y, OECD (2017). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Left-Right Self-Placement (ALLBUS). Empirical studies in the social sciences have shown that individual differences in interpersonal trust are systematically related to other variables. Interpersonal trust and the magnitude of protest: A micro and macro level approach. Our empirical validation based on a heterogeneous quota sample in the UK shows that all the reliability coefficients of the English-language adaptation and its correlations with external variables are satisfactory and comparable to those of the German-language source version. The Panorama of the Last Decades Theoretical Groundings of 3 0 obj In the first step, we analyzed the descriptive statistics and reference ranges separately for both versions of KUSIV3. 0000003616 00000 n Psychological Methods, 17, 437455. An English-language adaptation of the Social DesirabilityGamma Short Scale (KSE-G). First, our samples were restricted to participants in a web-based survey (CASI). To measure differences in interpersonal trust, Rotter (1967) developed an Interpersonal Trust Scale, which asked people to agree or disagree to 25 items that assessed interpersonal trust and 15 filler items designed to conceal the nature of the instrument. Measuring generalized trust: An examination of question wording and the number of scale points. Individual differences, dysfunctional attitudes, and social support: A study of the psychosocial adjustment to university life of home students. Int J Ment Health Syst. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01950.x, Kemper, C. J., Beierlein, C., Bensch, D., Kovaleva, A., & Rammstedt, B. Der konomische Wert sozialer Beziehungen [The economic value of social relations]. Interpersonal trust is highly relevant in peoples everyday lives and in contemporary society as a whole. (2014a): In line also with other previous findings, we found in both the UK and DE samples stable small-to-medium positive associations with life satisfaction (e.g., Barefoot et al., 1998; Jovanovi, 2016) and health (e.g., Barefoot et al., 1998; Feng, Vlachantoni, Liu, & Jones, 2016; Schneider, Konijn, Righetti, & Rusbult, 2011). The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. The Soweto Stress Scale, used in Phase 1 and previously developed by Mpondo et al. Interpersonal trust in Ecuador, the United States, and Zimbabwe. Cross-Cultural Research, 49, 393421. The full mark is 18126 points. The inter-item correlations are as follows: UKr12 = .34, r13 = .62, r23 = .28; DEr12 = .36, r13 = .67, r23 = .43. Behavior & Information Technology, 34, 363374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834, Cohen, J. 0000008722 00000 n For the German-language version of KUSIV3, initial findings by Beierlein, Kemper, et al. Stimpson, T. F. D. V., & Maughan, M. R. C. (1978). The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 92, 141143. Because no comparable ultra-short scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust exists for the English-language context, we adapted KUSIV3 to English and thoroughly investigated its psychometric properties of the English-language version using a sample from the United Kingdom (UK). Locus of control, interpersonal trust and academic achievement.