Lend-Lease: How the US Kept the Soviets Afloat in World War II On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. On December 7, 1940, its Prime Minister Winston Churchill pressed President Roosevelt in a 15-page letter for American help. No one ever discussed this subject officially, and I don't think Stalin left any written evidence of his opinion, but I will state here that several times in conversations with me he noted that these were the actual circumstances. [27] Other recipients were led by $11.3billion ($137billion) to the Soviet Union, $3.2billion ($38.7billion) to France, $1.6billion ($19.3billion) to China, and the remaining $2.6billion to the other Allies. THE ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF LEND-LEASE By EUGENE STALEY . Given the disruption to Soviet production and Red Army losses, the Soviet Union was understandably eager to put British armor into action as soon as possible. Deane, John R. 1947. For comparison, a total of 22 million tons landed in Europe to supply American forces from January 1942 to May 1945. This Douglas is the only Lend-Lease aircraft that remains in Russia.". Left to their own devices, Stalin and his commanders might have taken twelve to eighteen months longer to finish off the Wehrmacht; the ultimate result would probably have been the same, except that Soviet soldiers could have waded at France's Atlantic beaches. Lend-Lease was the most visible sign of wartime cooperation between the United States and the Soviet Union. The Lend-Lease Program, 1941-1945 - FDR Presidential Library & Museum 1776, 55Stat. Nikita Khrushchev, having served as a military commissar and intermediary between Stalin and his generals during the war, addressed directly the significance of Lend-lease aid in his memoirs: I would like to express my candid opinion about Stalin's views on whether the Red Army and the Soviet Union could have coped with Nazi Germany and survived the war without aid from the United States and Britain. TNA WO 193/580, Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022, Allied technological cooperation during World War II, "Letter, Winston Churchill to Franklin Roosevelt, December 7, 1940, pp. Supplies that arrived after the termination date were sold to the United Kingdom at a large discount for 1.075 billion, using long-term loans from the United States, which were finally repaid in 2006. Together with other recently published sources, including the wartime diaries of N. I. Biriukov, a Red Army officer responsible from August 1941 on for the distribution of recently acquired tanks to the front lines, this newly available evidence paints a very different picture from the received wisdom. How important was the Lend-Lease to the Soviet war effort? The Soviet Union got arms, ammunition, aircraft, and industrial equipment for its army. Courses on the British tanks for Soviet crews started during November as the first tanks, with British assistance, were being assembled from their in-transit states and undergoing testing by Soviet specialists. The sole modern heavy bomber the USSR had was the Petlyakov Pe-8, and it only had 27 of them at the start of the war, with fewer than 100 produced until 1945. Roosevelt concluded that the United States needed to help the Soviets fight against the Germans. In 194546, the value of Reciprocal Aid from New Zealand exceeded that of Lend-Lease, though in 194243, the value of Lend-Lease to New Zealand was much more than that of Reciprocal Aid. . The tanks reached the front lines with extraordinary speed. Ladd Field and the Lend-Lease Mission: Defending Alaska in WWII re: In hindsight was it a mistake for the US to ally with the Soviet Union during WW2. According to Biriukovs service diary, the first 20 British tanks arrived at the Soviet tank training school in Kazan on October 28, 1941, at which point a further 120 tanks were unloaded at the port of Archangel in northern Russia. That is the U.S. would be "repaid" when the recipient fought the common enemy and joined the world trade and diplomatic agencies, such as the United Nations.[51]. In September 1940, during the Battle of Britain the British government sent the Tizard Mission to the United States. In accordance with the Anglo-Soviet Military Supplies Agreement of June 27, 1942, military aid sent from Britain to the Soviet Union during the war was entirely free of charge. How important was the Lend-Lease to the Soviet war effort? But listen, one cannot deny that the Americans shipped over to us material without which we could not have equipped our armies held in reserve or been able to continue the war.[48]. [3] In terms of administration, the president established the Office of Lend-Lease Administration during 1941, headed by steel executive Edward R. New Orleans. The first of these units to have seen action seems to have been the 138th Independent Tank Battalion (with twenty-one British tanks), which was involved in stemming the advance of German units in the region of the Volga Reservoir to the north of Moscow in late November. . American shipments of telephone cable, aluminum, canned rations and clothing were also critical. But Was He Drugged Into Confessing. Once again, raw figures do not tell the whole story. [70][71], Significant numbers of British Churchill, Matilda and Valentine tanks were shipped to the USSR.[72]. HistoryNet.com is brought to you by HistoryNet LLC, the worlds largest publisher of history magazines. Has Russia paid off the USSR's Lend-Lease debt? - Quora Havlat, Denis. First protocol period from October 1, 1941, to June 30, 1942 (signed October 7, 1941), Second protocol period from July 1, 1942, to June 30, 1943 (signed October 6, 1942), Third protocol period from July 1, 1943, to June 30, 1944 (signed October 19, 1943). This act set up a system that would allow the United States to lend or lease war supplies to any nation deemed "vital to the defense of the United States." . Russian historian: Importance of Lend-Lease cannot be overestimated The history of Lend-Lease began on May 15, 1940 when UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill asked Roosevelt to temporarily. In particular, it shows that British Lend-Lease assistance to the Soviet Union in late 1941 and early 1942 played a far more significant part in the defense of Moscow and the revival of Soviet fortunes in late 1941 than has been acknowledged. And now they are saying that we had plenty of everything on our own.". It was a decisive step away from non-interventionist policy and toward open support for the Allies. 'We Would Have Lost': Did U.S. Lend-Lease Aid Tip The Balance In Soviet Some 3,964,000 tons of goods were shipped by the Arctic route; 7% was lost, while 93% arrived safely. Britain got of their arms and ammunition from this Act. This inevitably produced shortages of related products that are required for industrial or logistical uses, particularly unarmored vehicles. The 1947 money value of the supplies and services amounted to about $11 billion. Both were superior to all but the Soviet KV-1 and T-34 in armor, and indeed even their much maligned winter cross-country performance was comparable to most Soviet tanks excluding the KV-1 and T-34. In 1964 an Ohio woman took up the challenge that had led to Amelia Earharts disappearance. Most famously, Soviet dictator Josef Stalin raised a toast to the Lend-Lease program at the November 1943 Tehran conference with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt. In practice, very little equipment was in usable shape for peacetime uses. Lend-Lease effectively ended the United States' pretense of neutrality which had been enshrined in the Neutrality Acts of the 1930s. Milestones: 1937-1945 - Office of the Historian The Lend-Lease Act was the system by which the U.S. gave away $50 billion in military aid in 1941-45 (during World War II) so that the Allies could better fight Germany and Japan. Totaling $11.3 billion, or $180 billion in today's currency, the Lend-Lease Act of the United States supplied needed goods to the Soviet Union from 1941 to 1945 in support of what Stalin described to Roosevelt as the "enormous and difficult fight against the common enemy bloodthirsty Hitlerism." First, I would like to tell about some remarks Stalin made and repeated several times when we were "discussing freely" among ourselves. In spring 1944, the House passed a bill to renew the Lend-Lease program by a vote of 334 to 21. Under conditions of much of European Russia being occupied by the Axis, attrition was a losing prospect for the USSR; without Allied aid they might very well have collapsed as a military power some time in 1943. British and Commonwealth deliveries to the Soviet Union in late 1941 and early 1942 would not only assist in the Soviet defense of Moscow and subsequent counteroffensive, but also in increasing Soviet production for the next period of the war. The country's agriculture was in a difficult situation. A particular critical aspect of Lend-Lease was the supply of food. And the Soviet Union didn't pay much of that. The Soviets have long insisted that Lend-Lease aid made little difference. And they would have been perpetually hungry without American canned meat and fats. Did Soviet Union Repay Lend-lease? - Caniry 'We Would Have Lost': Did U.S. Lend-Lease Aid Tip The Balance In Soviet Fight Against Nazi Germany? The body of the captain, Maksim Tyurikov, was found by local hunters about 120 kilometers from the wreck in 1953. American aid also provided 4.5 million tons of food, 1.5 million blankets, and 15 million pairs of boots. The British Commonwealth and, to a lesser extent, the Soviet Union reciprocated with a smaller Reverse Lend-Lease program. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin 1982, Bd. Within months, the Lend-Lease program was expanded to include China and the Soviet Union. From: 30 Military Mission. The United States and the British Commonwealth provided 55. [32] In September 1943, he was promoted to Undersecretary of State, and Leo Crowley became director of the Foreign Economic Administration, which was given responsibility for Lend-Lease. Lend-Lease Act: Definition, Ukraine & World War II - HISTORY Mongolian lamb and meat donations to the front lines outperformed those sent by the Lend-Lease Act. An oft-quoted statement by First Vice-Chairman of the Council of Peoples Commissars Nikolai Voznesensky summed up the standard line that Allied aid represented only 4 percent of Soviet production for the entire war. "Transatlantic Generosity: Canada's 'Billion Dollar Gift' to the United Kingdom in the Second World War.". [55] This constituted some 23% of the total aid to the USSR during the war. L.7711, H.R. [15] Though these may be considered the most significant, many other items were also transported, including designs for rockets, superchargers, gyroscopic gunsights, submarine detection devices, self-sealing fuel tanks and plastic explosives. Although it was not entirely reasonable that Canada should pay for any construction that the Canadian Government considered unnecessary or that did not conform to Canadian requirements, nevertheless considerations of self-respect and national sovereignty led the Canadian Government to suggest a new financial agreement. At the end of November 1941, only 670 Soviet tanks were available to defend Moscowthat is, in the recently formed Kalinin, Western, and Southwestern Fronts. Agricultural issues were also compounded when the Soviets were on the offensive, as areas liberated from the Axis had been devastated and contained millions of people who needed to be fed. The U.S. received $2 million in reverse Lend-Lease from the USSR. 5,218 tanks (including 1,380 Valentines from Canada), 323 machinery trucks (mobile vehicle workshops equipped with generators and all the welding and power tools required to perform heavy servicing), 1.15bn ($1.55bn) worth of aircraft engines, Allen, R. G. D. "Mutual Aid Between the U.S. and The British Empire, 1941-45". According to the Russian historian Boris Vadimovich Sokolov, Lend-Lease had a crucial role in winning the war: On the whole the following conclusion can be drawn: that without these Western shipments under Lend-Lease the Soviet Union not only would not have been able to win the Great Patriotic War, it would not have been able even to oppose the German invaders, since it could not itself produce sufficient quantities of arms and military equipment or adequate supplies of fuel and ammunition. On September 20, 1945, all Lend-Lease to the Soviet Union was terminated. The Soviet debt for Lend-Lease supplies was finally paid and closed as part of the settlements with the Paris Club on August 21, 2006. The 19th and Early 20th Century History. Mentions of Lend-Lease in memoirs were always accompanied by disparagement of the quality of the weapons supplied, with American and British tanks and planes invariably portrayed as vastly inferior to comparable Soviet models. Officially the "Special Committee on Investigation of the Munitions Industry". Championed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Lend-Lease Act authorized the transfer . To address balance of payment issues between the US and Canada, and to prevent the US monopolizing British orders, the Hyde Park Declaration of 20 April 1941[28] made weapons and components manufactured in Canada for Britain eligible for Lend-Lease financing as if they had been manufactured in the US. [12] The aim of the British Technical and Scientific Mission was to obtain the industrial resources to exploit the military potential of the research and development work completed by the UK up to the beginning of World War II, but that Britain itself could not exploit due to the immediate requirements of war-related production. In fact our armed forces in Britain, ground as well as air, receive as reverse lend-lease, with no payment by us, one third of all the supplies and equipment they currently require, Britain furnishes 90% of their medical supplies and in spite of her food shortage, 20% of their food.[78]. Reverse Lend-Lease to the United States totalled $7.8 billion. The Lend-Lease policy was officially titled "An Act to Promote the Defense of the United States", and was a program where the U.S. supplied Free France, Great Britain and the Republic of China with food, oil, and materiel between 1941 and August 1945. . . How important was lend lease to Soviet Union? [55], The Pacific Route opened in August 1941, but was affected by the start of hostilities between Japan and the U.S.; after December 1941, only Soviet ships could be used, and, as Japan and the USSR observed a strict neutrality towards each other, only non-military goods could be transported. In contrast, 17 Republicans (63 percent) voted "nay" while 10 Senate Republicans (37 percent) sided with the Democrats to pass the bill.[19]. Roosevelt believed that if the Soviets were defeated the Allies would be far more likely to lose. The United States and the British Commonwealth provided 55 percent of all the aluminum the Soviet Union used during the war and more than 80 percent of the copper. [34], Lend-Lease contributed to the Allied victory. The supplies dispersed under the Lend-Lease Act ranged from tanks, aircraft, ships, weapons and road building supplies to clothing, chemicals and food.
Sullivan Funeral Home Hanson Ma Obituaries,
Que Milagros Hizo San Judas Tadeo,
Michael O'loughlin Obituary,
Articles A
