atone, atonement or propitiation). Rowley concluded, "From beginning to end this [first] volume is a shining example of how the Bible should not be translated. New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures - Wikipedia It also seems not surprising that Westcott would call the Jesuit inspired Oxford Movement, "the Oxford Revival!" "The Oxford Revival in the middle of the century, quickened anew that sense of corporate life. Who Were Westcott & Hort? | Biblical Training for private distribution only. Both Westcott and Hort were known to have resented the pre-eminence given to the Authorized Version and its underlying Greek Text. Nov. 4th Hort: I went down and spent a Sunday with WestcottWe came to a distinct and positive understanding about our Gk. In 1851 Westcott was ordained an Anglican "priest" and Hort in 1856: their careers were spent mostly in academic positions rather than pastorates. The Authorized Version of the Bible is the precepts of a mighty nation, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtUfgtgB_Is, http://www.vaticanassassins.org/highly-recommended-chris-pintos-superb-video-the-untold-history-of-the-bible/, http://www.cobourgatheist.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1210:how-the-bible-was-written-and-is-a-forgery&catid=25:the-bible&Itemid=107, http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/quote-t.htm, Putins War Spoils Zelenskys Dream; Lithuania Opposes Ukraine entry into NATO, Russia Launches Massive Air, Land and Sea Attacks on Ukraine. Reader of new versions, claiming to be believers this is the kind of man you follow, by allowing his words into your mind and heart! Westcott and Hort were responsible for the greatest feat in textual criticism. Answer:He is the Vicar of Christ, the King of Kings, and Lord of Lords, and there is but one Judgment-Seat belonging to God and the Pope.. And, whatever the truth may be, this seems just the liberty required at the present moment, if any living belief is to survive in the land. (Life, Vol.I, p.454). These men were heretics. There will be a true church awaiting his return. [52] The complete New World Translation has been published in more than one hundred languages or scripts, with the New Testament available in more than fifty additional languages. Johann Eichhorn (1752-1827) expanded the concept by dividing up Genesis and part of Exodus. Priests were in prison for their plotting, and many had fled to the Continent. The following quotes from the diaries and letters of Westcott and Hort demonstrate their serious departures from orthodoxy, revealing their opposition to evangelical Protestantism and sympathies with Rome and ritualism. What the above shows, is that by simply joining the dots, we discover that all new versions are the devils own brand; they are founded on Roman Catholic documents that have always been rejected by genuine believers, and are carefully edited by Jesuits to agree with Roman dogma, via W&H and a host of other unbelievers. The remaining 3-5% that disagree with the majority of manuscripts. The storm of public indignation which followed almost wrecked the Revision at the outset. [125], The 2003 edition of the New Catholic Encyclopedia states, "[Jehovah's Witnesses] are allowed no other books than the Bible and the society's own publications, which includes its own translation of the Bible with an impressive critical apparatus. [87], In 1982, Pentecostal theologian Gordon Fee and Douglas K. Stuart in their How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth refer to the New World Translation without a critical examination or discussion as being an "extremely literal translation" filled with "heretical doctrines". [35] The committee requested that the Watch Tower Society not publish the names of its members,[36][37] stating that they did not want to "advertise themselves but let all the glory go to the Author of the Scriptures, God,"[38] adding that the translation, "should direct the reader, not to the translators, but to the Bibles Author, Jehovah God". Thus, the Douay we now have is not the original and has been altered extensively over the past several hundred years. The translators state that, where possible in the target language, the New World Translation prefers literal renderings and does not paraphrase the original text. Then, we have this (the dots are getting closer together! Jehovah's WitnessesProclaimers of God's Kingdom (1993) Chap. ""Between-the-Lines" Translations of the Bible". [92] According to the October 15, 1999 issue of The Watchtower, Goodspeed wrote to the Watch Tower Society in 1950 stating, "I am interested in the mission work of your people, and its world wide scope, and much pleased with the free, frank and vigorous translation. "Jehovah's Witnesses distribute free Bibles", "All Scripture is Inspired of God and Beneficial" 1990 pp. To destroy the faith and doctrines of the Protestants, whom they want to bring back into the fold of Roman Catholicism. Look no further than the old Russian communist regime! He concluded that the Gospel records are nothing more than a collection of myths which portrayed truths about mans existence rather than telling about actual historical events. In order to understand the New Testament, according to Bultmann, it is necessary to demythologize them. (worldincrisis). Westcott and Hort agree upon plan of a joint revision of the text of the Greek Testament. Translations in English with similar renderings include. These men are obviously led by the spirit but I am not entirely sure it is Holy. It is a sad thing when men make merchandise of the Word of God.(Gipp). 23rd Fenton John Anthony Hort born at Dublin. The following quote is by Hort: Hort, Arthur Fenton, Life and Letters of Fenton John Hort, New York, 1896, Vol 1, p81. Maurice was a dedicated Unitarian minister who had been discharged from Kings College because of his atheistic teachings, yet was appointed to the Revised Version Committee through Horts influence. To use them to overthrow the Received Text would demand GREAT TRAINING and almost HERCULEAN labors; for the Received Text was apparently INVINCIBLE. In Britain, a different approach was taken by men who also chose to think themselves smarter than Gods Word. Amen., (3) AMERICAN REVISED VERSION OF 1901: And bring us not into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one., (1) KING JAMES BIBLE. Same goes for any other letter. [30] The committee also referred to the Novum Testamentum Graece (18th edition, 1948) and to works by Jesuit scholars Jos M. Bover (1943),[30] and Augustinus Merk (1948). The New Testament was written in "Koine" Greek, not the Greek that the Catholic Church, via Jesuits, used to counter the Great . Both Westcott and Hort loved Rome and Mary. That many of us do not share such adulative language is irrelevant, of course! Were Westcott and Hort Secret Practitioners of the Occults? This was done with a 14 year training that left them totally submissive to the pope and devoted to the destruction of Protestants and truth. I have already shown that W&H were Romanists. How very different from the open and honest work of the KJAV translators! "[96] He concluded, "this work indicates a great deal of effort and thought as well as considerable scholarship, it is to be regretted that religious bias was allowed to colour many passages. Phillip Mauro was a brilliant lawyer who was admitted to the bar of the supreme Court in April 1892. Rowley, How Not To Translate the Bible, The Expository Times, 1953; 65; 41. They are exactly the same sources found in the Jesuit bible of 1582 and these are reproduced in the first of the cursed new versions the Revised Version! Westcott, A., Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott, MacMillan and Co., London, 1903, vols. He organized secret Catholics (including Jesuit agents planted in the church and university) into a working whole. Ignatius wrote special rules, and in his Rules for Thinking with the Church, he said: That we may be altogether of the same mind and in conformity if (the church) shall have defined anything to be black which to our eyes appear to be white, we ought in like manner to pronounce it to be black.. Dec. 23rd Westcott: My faith is still wavering. That was why it then relied on its storm-troopers, the Jesuits, to do a better job of assassination of scripture, and its leader, Ignatius was the right warped man for its success. It only reinforces the Catholic Catechism, which says this abominable thing: Question:What if the Holy Scriptures command one thing, and the Pope another contrary to it? They are called the Majority Text. A. Hort (1881) was used as the basis for translating the New Testament into English. The face of the virgin is unspeakably beautiful. Helvidius, the devout scholar of northern Italy (400 A.D.), who had the pure manuscripts, accused Jerome of using corrupt manuscripts on this text. Remember, too, that both W&H were entranced by the theories of Charles Darwin. [30][31] Cross references which had appeared in the six separate volumes were updated and included in the complete volume in the 1984 revision. 3 Jeromes Latin Vulgate Bible contains no errors. The phrase bless them that curse you is omitted from both the Revised and the Jesuit. Their views on Scripture and the Text are highlighted. Additional works consulted in preparing the New World Translation include the Armenian Version, Coptic Versions, the Latin Vulgate, Sistine and Clementine Revised Latin Texts, Textus Receptus, the Johann Jakob Griesbach's Greek text, the Emphatic Diaglott, and various papyri.[50]. Required fields are marked *. This Greek New Testament was the basis for the Revised Version of that same year. In 1993, Gail Riplinger published New Age Bible Versions. In other words, when everyone spoke Latin the new versions of Rome could not gather momentum. But the answer is simple enough. Further editing and translation is then performed to produce a final version.[44]. They used corrupt sources calling it new Greek! While rector of the English College at Rome, he studied under Cardinal Angelo Mai (1782-1854), prefect of the Vatican library and celebrated editor of the Codex Vaticanus.(W.P. Later, as a soldier, he was crippled by a wound and so entered into more spiritual activities. [39], Former high-ranking Watch Tower staff have identified various members of the translation team. The Emancipation Act of 1829 made it legal for Roman Catholics to become elected to parliament. 1858 Oct. 21st Hort: The principle literary work of these years was the revision of the Greek Text of the New Testament. These three men deeply affected later theological thought, down to our own time. We still do not wish it to be talked about, but are going to work at once, and hope we may perhaps have it out in little more than a year. (Life, Vol.I, p.264). The unmitigating emergence of unauthorized Bible versions is risen up to challenge and remove the Authorized Version of the Bible (which thing cannot be done for the Lord said that his words shall not pass away. Now, add this: Wescott and Hort, were a pair of unsaved liberals whose open Vatican sympathies cast them as the consummate Jesuit plants.(Dr Bill Grady, Final Authority). [12][13], It is not the first Bible to be published by the Watch Tower Society, but it is its first original translation of ancient Biblical Hebrew, Koine Greek, and Old Aramaic biblical texts. (Dr. G. Vance Smith, a Unitarian scholar, was a member of the Revision Committee. Even the New World Translation of the Jehovah's Witnesses can survive the scrutiny of the critics. I have been surprised, in comparing the Revised Testament with other versions, to find how many of the changes, which are important and valuable, have been anticipated by the Rhemish translation, which now forms a part of what is known as the Douay Bible And yet a careful comparison of these new translations with the Rhemish Testament, shows them, in many instances, to be simply a return to this old version, and leads us to think that possibly there were as finished scholars three hundred years ago as now, and nearly as good apparatus for the proper rendering of the original text.(B Warfield, Collection of Opinions, Vol II, pp52,53). I have shown in many articles that W&H, Tischendorf and others stand condemned by their own hearts, words and work. "[121], Julius R. Mantey, co-author of A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament and A Hellenistic Greek Reader, said in 1980 that the NWT's rendering of John 1:1 is "a shocking mistranslation" and "Obsolete and incorrect". FROM THEIR OWN MOUTHSA selection of statements revealing the attitudes of these two most noted textual critics of the 19 Century. The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures (NWT) is a translation of the Bible published by the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society; it is used and distributed by Jehovah's Witnesses. [111], In 1954, Unitarian theologian Charles Francis Potter stated about the New World Translation: "Apart from a few semantic peculiarities like translating the Greek word stauros as 'stake' instead of 'cross', and the often startling use of the colloquial and the vernacular, the anonymous translators have certainly rendered the best manuscript texts, both Greek and Hebrew, with scholarly ability and acumen. Once Latin became the exclusive playground of the scholars, the texts could not be checked. His aim makes it very hard to accept that the Codex Sinaiticus he supposedly found in a monastery just so happened to provide him with his proof! Note how this statement was made at the same time that the Higher Critics were gaining ground in theology, and just before W&H began their own work of destruction of the word. On this, Canon Cook says, Yet this enormous omission rests on the sole authority of and B. (That is, on the Vatican Manuscript and the one found in 1859 in a Catholic monastery. I would repeat what many Protestants now do not accept that new versions are satanic in origin, aim and content. Hort to Lightfoot: It is, I think, difficult to measure the weight of acceptance won beforehand for the Revision by the single fact of our welcoming an Unitarian, if only the Company perseveres in its present serious and faithful spirit. (Life, Vol.II, p.140). He had enough proof from these to show that Jerome used corrupt manuscripts the same as were used by W&H and all later new version authors! It is of interest that Richard Simon (1638-1712), a Roman Catholic priest, was the first to delve into Biblical criticism. [44][45], At the Watch Tower Society's annual meeting on October 5, 2013, a significantly revised translation was released. In 1978, the Watch Tower Society began producing recordings of the New World Translation on audio cassette,[71] with the New Testament released by 1981[72] and the Old Testament in three albums released by 1990. Even so, where necessary, Paul named names, and so did Jesus! In essence, then, modern versions are Romanist. By 1845, it was obvious that Newman had accomplished all he could secretly, so he then openly left the Church of England. Walter Martin, The Kingdom of the Cults Revised, Updated, and Expanded Anniversary Edition, Bethany House Publishers, Minneapolis, Minnesota 1997, p. 125. Dr. Scrivener was the one man that fought them tooth and nail all the way, but he was always outvoted. This demonic attraction for what is plainly corrupt has led to a W&H link to Strongs! In 1851, Hort and Westcott started the Ghost Society which over the years included some of the most influential intellectuals in England including future Prime Minister Arthur Balfour. Satan countered by having unbelieving heretics, Westcott and Hort (WH), create a Greek New Testament in 1811, based on the corrupt Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, which removed many words that validate Jesus' deity. not very long after that time, especially in Mormonism . Whereas, the KJAV and its antecedents stood solidly true: it did not change simply because its sources were accurate and genuine! 17,18). And Joseph and His mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of Him., (2) JESUIT VERSION. On this, Canon Cook says, Yet this enormous omission rests on the sole authority of and B.(2) (That is, on the Vatican Manuscript and the one found in 1859 in a Catholic monastery.) All spare hours were devoted to it. (Life, Vol.I, p.399). Most of our other colleges and universities in North America have, since the early 1980s, swung into the orbit. This cannot be any text resting solely on our own judgment, even if we were not too inexperienced to make one; but it must be supported by a clear and obvious preponderance of evidence. Revision Company. "[116] He concludes: "The translation of the New Testament is evidence of the presence in the movement of scholars qualified to deal intelligently with the many problems of Biblical translation. pp. The rules though liberal are vague, and the interpretation of them will depend upon decided action at first. (Life, Vol.I, p.391). W P Grady said this: One of the better-known Jesuit plants of this period was Cardinal John Henry Newman (1801-1990). [23][24][25] The Watch Tower Society is said to have "become aware" of the committee's existence a year later. The Satanic Influence on the Scofield Bible - Historicist.info That is, Alexandrian).. The name Jehovah is a translation of the Tetragrammaton (Hebrew: , transliterated as YHWH, though the original pronunciation is unknown). Here was his clear acknowledgement of what most scholars already knew: thousands of manuscripts from different countries in different ages, said the SAME thing! At Westcotts suggestion, a celebration of Holy Communion was held on June 22nd before the first meeting of the N.T. [119], In 1967, Robert H. Countess wrote that the "NWT has certain praiseworthy featuresfor example, an apparatus criticuseveryone must admit", but described the NWT's rendering of "a god" at John 1:1 as "most unfortunate for several reasons". They considered it quite decisive whenever these two manuscripts agreed, particularly when reinforced by other ancient uncial manuscripts. Then continue reading more of Horts words below: The old dogmatic view of the Bible therefore, is not only open to attack from the standpoint of science and historical criticism, but IF TAKEN SERIOUSLY it becomes a DANGER to religion and public moralsGod is the author, NOT of the Bible BUT of the life in which the authors of the Bible partake, and of which they tell in such IMPERFECT HUMAN WORDS as they could command. Trained at Cambridge University in classical Greek and Latin B. Voluminous writer C. Evangelical II. (English Hexapla, pp. While there, Newman sought an interview with Cardinal Wiseman, who was later to have a telling influence on the 1871-1881 revision of the King James Bible and the romanizing of the English Church. July 7th Hort: Dr. But deliver us from evil. At the age of 23, in late 1851, Hort . Westcott and Hort were Jesuits to their darkest core. Hort was deeply influenced, too, by an Unitarian minister and Unitarians are just atheists in disguise: Frederick Maurice was a close friend of Horts, who Hort said deeply influenced me (ibid., p. 155). By this time, German higher criticism was beginning to invade England, and many Anglican clergymen were being attracted to it. We heartily recommend the New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures, published in 1950 by the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society. Every theology student today who is trained in outside universities is subjected to this kind of thinking. Amen., (2) JESUIT VERSION OF 1582: And lead us not into temptation. [28][29], The translation of the Old Testament, which Jehovah's Witnesses refer to as the Hebrew Scriptures, was released in five volumes in 1953, 1955, 1957, 1958, and 1960. I find it hard to understand why any Christian would want to side with such a man as him, or W&H! This proliferating emergence of unauthorized versions is a full frontal attack launched (and sustained) against the word of God to remove itand replace it with something else. It bears traces of careless transcription on every page. "[108] Metzger said there were a number of "indefensible" characteristics of the translation, including its use of "Jehovah" in the New Testament. 1851 Feb. 7th Hort: Westcott is just coming out with his Norrisian on The Elements of the Gospel Harmony. I have seen the first sheet on Inspiration, which is a wonderful step in advance of common orthodox heresy. (Life, Vol.I, p.181). That was my first introduction to B. F. Westcott (1825-1901) and F. J. ): In my first term at the University, the controversial fires were beginning to blaze . Ignorant people are now saying that the Authorized King James Bible is wrong because they have believed the scholarship of these two blaspheming infidels. Both Wescott and Hort were known to have resented the pre-eminence given to the Authorized Version and its underlying Greek Text. This present book will concern itself with each of the above three items.(The Attack Intensifies, in worldincrisis.com). Sept. 4th Westcott and Horts The New Testament in the Original Greek Vol.II published (Introduction and Appendix). Again,Westcott and Horts Greek New Testament is the source text for todays modern Bible versions. practically a sine qua non for co-operation, I fear I could not join you, even if you were willing to forget your fears about the origin of the Gospels. (Life, Vol. Translators are given a list of words and expressions commonly used in the English New World Translation with related English words grouped together (e.g. July 1st Westcott to Hort: The Revision on the whole surprised me by prospects of hope. It is almost laughable that many who use these corrupt modern versions also oppose Rome in their speech! 4 Only the Roman Catholic clergy have the right to interpret the Scriptures.. Westcott And Hort Occultists Or Christians You Decide 11x 17 Westcott and Hort - Wikipedia Aug. 11th Westcott: I never read an account of a miracle (in Scripture?) (See YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtUfgtgB_Is). pp.251,252). At others it is neither modern nor scholarly. The original New World Translation employs nearly 16,000 English expressions to translate about 5,500 biblical Greek terms, and over 27,000 English expressions to translate about 8,500 Hebrew terms. The true Bible turns unlearned and ignorant men into gospel preachers and casts out all fear.. The differences in the Greek manuscripts come from a very few of those 5,300 manuscripts(ED. Square brackets [ ] were added around words that were inserted editorially, but were removed as of the 2006 printing. [109], J. Carter Swaim in 1953 wrote that "objection is sometimes made to new translations on the ground that to abolish archaic phrases tends to cheapen the Scripture". Remember that the Revised Version was the brainchild of Westcott and Hort. The phrase bless them that curse you is omitted from both the Revised and the Jesuit. June Mr. Daniel Macmillan suggests to Hort that he should take part in an interesting and comprehensive New Testament Scheme. Hort was to edit the text in conjunction with Mr. Westcott; the latter was to be responsible for a commentary, and Lightfoot was to contribute a N.T. It is very small, with one kneeling-place, and behind a screen was a Pieta the size of life (i.e. [115] He also stated that "some of the renderings which are free from a theological tendency strike one as quite good". But, then along came Luther, who fanned the flames of the Reformation! Newman, Apologia Pro Vita Sue, p. 225 [published years later when he openly renounced Protestantism and became a Catholic cardinal].). Here are a few of these things; each one either began or alarmed a resurgent attack on the Bible in the 19th century: German higher criticism, a basic attack on the integrity of the Bible. What matters is that Tischendorf is behind an attempt to dismantle and finally destroy Christian beliefs, by firstly destroying faith in Gods word. Eusebius had the choice of using the Greek manuscripts from Antioch or from Alexandria to make up the 50 Greek Bibles. 27 p. 611, subheading Translation Into Other Languages. According to the publishers, better manuscript evidence had made it possible to determine with greater accuracy what the original writers intended, particularly in more obscure passages, allowing linguists to better understand certain aspects of the original languages. So the linguistic solution in any given case may be open to debate. The Differentiator (June 1959), cited in Ian Croft, "The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures: Does It Really Have the Support of Greek Scholars? Does this fact prove just how unreliable the new versions are? Referring to the new revision, the publishers stated, "There are now about 10 percent fewer English words in the translation. Cardinal Wiseman wrote, To call it any longer the Douay or Rheims Version is an abuse of terms. The Two Paths Of New Testament Manuscripts - End Time Deceptions THE WESTCOTT & HORT CONSPIRACY - THE TRUE STORY OF OUR MODERN BIBLE TRANSLATIONS RESOURCES Disclaimer Introduction Symphony of Truth In a Nutshell Topical Guide 5-144000 5 Commissions 10 Commandments 333 NCCG Number 144,000, The A Action Stations Agency, Free Alcohol Angels Anointing Apostles Apostolic Interviews Apostolic Epistles That is, a genuine conspiracy amongst people who wish to press forward a particular agenda, with proofs of their actions finally revealed. Milton was a name of horror.(J.A. At some points it is actually dishonest. Ed. His idea became the foundation of documentary hypothesis. You well know with what folds it entwines us and with what fangs it gnaws us.(The Jesuits in History, Hector Macpherson, Ozark Book Publishers, 1997, Appendix 1). About 95-97% of them agree together. Look at the aims of Rome: The true Bible is the arch-enemy of the Roman Catholic Church. Dean Burgon said: On many occasions 10, 20, 30, 40 words are dropped through very carelessness. Answer:The Holy Scriptures must be thrown aside. Both of these underpin all modern versions. This acceptance of Tischendorf by atheism is also shown in a quote used onhttp://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/quote-t.htm, If the New Testament is defective the church itself is in error, and must be given up as adeception..
Cameron Crowe Sister,
Blood In Blood Out Characters,
Ibew Job Rumors,
Articles W
