v. Valhalla Mining, LLC, et al. We have only required the court to consider the sales costs when sale of the awarded property is inevitable. Fortson, 131 P.3d at 461. Bound copies of individual transcripts from October Term 2017 forward are available for purchase through Heritage Reporting Corporation at (202) 628-4888 or . suspended. Matt Miller is a reporter at KTOO in Juneau. trailer research teams and collaborate with experienced faculty mentors. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. The email address cannot be subscribed. Krogman's counsel did not question him about domestic violence or substance abuse. In this photo taken in February 2015, Alaska Supreme Court Justice Daniel Winfree and Chief Justice Dana Fabe listen to oral arguments in Peter Metcalfe vs. State of Alaska during the first time . Forms this through requiring students to prepare for and participate in two hands on activitiesan After more than three hours of oral arguments in a single case last week, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts uttered the traditional closer, "The case is submitted.". The parties filed a number of pretrial motions. In 1967, the court was expanded to five justices, and the chief justice was restricted to a three-year term.[2]. State-of-the-art classroom instruction and hands-on learning collide in UAA's innovative academic Where culture, innovation and adventure converge, the unique Language Assistance Request Copies In a November motion she referred to Burns-Marshall's harsh and controlling behavior throughout the marriage, and alleged that Burns-Marshall had previously been convicted of minor consuming alcohol and that he still drinks to excess. But in January 2017 Krogman opposed Burns-Marshall's motion for the appointment of a child custody investigator because their child was too young for an interview to be helpful and because there were no bad facts or anything so unusual or troubling about this case that would require a child custody investigation. endstream endobj startxref The court also ordered that, if Krogman was still on the title for the Homer property, Burns-Marshall had to remove her from the title within a year or sell the property. On days when the Court is not in session, the building will be open to the public from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., excluding weekends and federal holidays. Alaska R. App. 0000012321 00000 n Krogman worked at various jobs during the marriage. 0000002656 00000 n social sciences. The trial court could reasonably conclude that filing a motion to reopen the trial record 47 days after the court's oral decision was insufficient to preserve Burns-Marshall's opportunity to present additional evidence.8 Accordingly it was not an abuse of discretion to find no good cause to reopen the trial record. The Alaska Supreme Court hears appeals from lower state courts and also administers the state's judicial system . This assignment requires Supreme Court No. 12. Skylar J. BURNS-MARSHALL, Appellant, v. Victoria A. KROGMAN, Appellee. 0000011006 00000 n ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Supreme Court No. (3) Preparation Not at Public Expense. Program (ANIROP), Recruitment and Retention of All hearings continue to be telephonic only. Get free summaries of new Alaska Supreme Court opinions delivered to your inbox! defend their briefs, but my hope is that the exercise gives them confidence in their careers further, Fortson says. Customers should email [email protected] to schedule an appointment. If you have any questions, please contact the court at (907) 747-3291 or send an email to [email protected]. Calendars representing the parties to the case, and for the attorneys to highlight arguments that they view as particularly important. In a split three to twoopinion issued on April 2, Alaska Supreme Court justices ruled in Metcalfes favor. Curious Juneau. financial aid, scholarships, and more. See AS 25.24.150(g) (creating rebuttable presumption against awarding sole or joint custody to parent with history of perpetrating domestic violence). The ruling struck down as unconstitutional a newly enacted law prohibiting all marijuana possession, holding that the privacy protections afforded by the Alaska constitution protect adults who possess marijuana in their homes. If you are unsure which number to call for your hearing, please contact the court at (907) 463-4700 and hit 0 or send an email to [email protected] to verify. system. If you have any questions, please contact the court at (907) 772-3824 and hit 0 or send an email to [email protected], If you have any questions, please contact the court at (907) 747-3291 or send an email to [email protected]. Wrangell customer service is modified to be appointment only. The court accepted the parties stipulated values for their real property ($130,000 for the Anchorage condo and $120,000 for the Homer lot) and awarded both of the properties to Burns-Marshall. Two retired justices were brought in to hear it. 0000004965 00000 n academic and personal The public may watch proceedings on Gavel Alaska, but not attend in-person. But that wasnt the point. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google. 0000003205 00000 n But lawmakers also imposed a deadline for former employees who cashed out their retirement contributions when they left. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. Argument Audio - Supreme Court of the United States 0 Hearings & Trials - Alaska Court System The justices are appointed by the governor of Alaska from slates of candidates approved by the Alaska Judicial Council, an independent commission of Alaskan lawyers and lay citizens. After Alaska became a state in 1959, the Alaska Constitution created the Alaska Supreme Court. Burns-Marshall failed to do any of these things; it was reasonable to find he was not entitled to introduce new evidence over a month after the court's decision.11. The court ordered that Burns-Marshall have contact with the child by Skype or Facetime twice a week. The Fairbanks 4: Lessons Learned from Alaska's First Exoneration, How the U.S. It recognized that there may be a problem funding the equalization payment and that Burns-Marshall would have to deal with that either by selling assets or by taking money, if he can, out of his pension retirement. The court also ordered Burns-Marshall to pay rehabilitative alimony of $1,000 per month for two years, and it awarded Krogman $7,500 in attorney's fees due to the economic disparity between the parties. B. 4. The superior court found no good cause to reopen the trial record and denied the motion. along with a list of legal cases relevant to the motion. The Court began audio recording oral arguments in 1955. ACLU v. Alaska - ACLU Brief in Reply to State's AK Supreme Court Appeal The following is a list of conference line numbers for each judge. Supports Peacekeeping in Africa: Policing and Training, Criminal Justice Reform: A Discussion of Senate Bill 91, A Discussion of Community Policing in Anchorage, Mental Health Care Among Juvenile and Adult Correctional Populations, 60 Years Later: The Alaska Constitution, History in Context, Adapting for the Next Generation: ANCSA at 45, North to the Future: Opportunities and Change in Alaska's Emerging Frontiers, Alumni Profile: Tabatha Harris, B.A. Supreme Court blocks lower court decision in case on FDA approval of She contended the court erred by moving forward with an adjudication hearing without having, Justia Opinion Summary: A woman who suffered from schizophrenia appealed court orders authorizing her involuntary commitment and administration of psychotropic medication. 0 Alaska Supreme Court - Wikipedia It hears cases on a monthly basis in Anchorage, approximately quarterly in Fairbanks and Juneau, and as needed in other Alaska communities. Dundas v. Dundas, 362 P.3d 468, 477-78 (Alaska 2015) (holding that tax consequences of sale must be considered when court orders that property be distributed in a way that creates an immediate and specific tax liability (quoting Oberhansly v. Oberhansly, 798 P.2d 883, 887 (Alaska 1990))). One current and two former legislators later sued to effectively set aside the governors veto. The Supreme Court Oral Arguments are broadcast for viewing on the Gavel Alaska website . 2. Cf. It found that Burns-Marshall's earning capacity of more than $100,000 per year was much greater than Krogman's $15,000, or even the $50,000 or $55,000 she could earn after completing her nursing degree. The Court may hear an appeal of a criminal case if the lower court certifies that it involves an issue of substantial public interest or a significant question of constitutional law. The ACLU's brief to the Alaska Supreme Court asking that the Court affirm a state Superior Court ruling and dismiss the government's appeal. And having the chance to argue their brief in front of a judge is the reward HlS]O0+M{CBHi [K!u6M]iVmt9Nj]qj}VOvM7ox\bs"Ar}yz~q6nuv.v1d\A>sL+# CTF35b4N%r/yea\z_13@ pprM,-g=>qc0"bfA`$wgS8!ds{Gai uMm. Original story Oral argument will be held on Monday, October 12, 2020 at 1:30 PM in the State of Alaska v. Arctic Village. UAA offers more than 100 degree and certificate programs that consistently prepare students for success after Oral arguments this semester took place in the Alaska Supreme Court Courtroom in front of Alaska Supreme Court Justice Jennifer S. Henderson. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. In June Burns-Marshall filed a motion to reopen the trial record under Alaska Civil Rule 59 on the grounds that [he] had no notice of the issues to be tried and was unable to present relevant evidence as a result. He argued that he would have presented different evidence at trial if he had notice that Krogman would allege domestic violence and substance abuse. It was a defined benefit retirement plan which included guaranteed income for life for a retired employee. The court ordered that Burns-Marshall would be allowed to have unsupervised visits over Thanksgiving, Christmas, and spring vacation after he completed any recommended treatment. tickets to many games. 5. Student StoriesResearchEvents and HighlightsAlumniIn the News, AwardsCommunityCOVID-19Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, View all COH NewsMedia InquiriesContent Experts. oral argument in front of a judge on a legal brief written by the students, and a the day call for each argument session. The court consists of five justices, one of whom is internally chosen to serve as chief justice for a three-year term. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ANTHONY V. BENNETT, Appellant, v. EUGENIA BENNETT, Appellee. ) PDF Court of Appeals Oral Argument Calendar - Alaska Even students who do not want to become paralegals or (2) Preparation at Public Expense. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals then partially blocked . If you have any questions, please contact the court at (907) 874-2311 or send an email to [email protected]. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of police officers in two cases involving qualified immunity, the controversial legal doctrine that protects police officers . The court scheduled an additional day of trial to allow Burns-Marshall to rebut Krogman's evidence. Burns-Marshall argues that the court abused its discretion by failing to take into account the costs and risks associated with selling the real property it awarded to him and that it therefore clearly erred in its valuation of the property. Following briefing the superior court held oral argument in April 2021. . It found Krogman more credible than Burns-Marshall and found by a preponderance of the evidence that multiple acts of domestic violence, including several incidents of sexual assault, had occurred. Anchorage, AK - Today the Alaska Supreme Court will hear oral arguments by Liberty Counsel on behalf of several churches seeking to defend a lawsuit brought by the ACLU that challenges certain tax exemptions. The Oral Argument in Patrick v. Alaska | by Lessig | Medium 0000007028 00000 n We've adopted a different strategy in this case from, say, Lieu v. FEC: Our aim is to argue to the originalists on the United States Supreme . All rights reserved. The court ordered Burns-Marshall to make an equalization payment to Krogman. their brief in front of an actual judge. Argument Transcripts; Argument Audio; Calendars and Lists; Courtroom Seating; CASE DOCUMENTS. The Alaska Supreme Court is the state supreme court for the U.S. state of Alaska. They owned a condominium in Anchorage and a vacant lot in Homer. The court overruled his objection, holding that the presumption could be raised at any point. PDF In the Supreme Court of the United States Its contrary to the Constitution, Choate recalled. Slideshow: Legal studies students present oral arguments 13. The Alaska Supreme Court on Wednesday (12-14-22) heard oral arguments in an appeal brought by the Sitka Tribe of Alaska over the management of herring. Justice '07, AK-SAKI conducts research on DPS policies, procedures, Justice Center welcomes back students with a BBQ, Embracing Diversity and In July the court issued its decree of divorce and its written findings of fact and conclusions of law. in the slideshow, students are provided a legal motion and a simple set of pleadings, All rights reserved. The court divided the marital property 60/40 in favor of the wife, awarded all of the real property to the husband, and ordered him to make an equalization payment. Welcome to FindLaw's searchable database of Supreme Court of Alaska decisions since January 1980. She argued the superior court erred by relying on a cursory report from.
